Question

最近，教育部對“高中是否該取消文理分科”公開向社會(huì)征求意見。 為此，某媒體做了一次民意調(diào)查，結(jié)果如圖表所示。

支持分科	反對分科	無所謂	其他
43%	50%	6%	1%

 

支持原因	反對原因	你的觀點(diǎn)
1減輕學(xué)業(yè)負(fù)擔(dān)； 2 現(xiàn)代社會(huì)需要專業(yè)人才	1人才需要有廣泛的知識(shí) 2 可以培養(yǎng)復(fù)合型人才	????

  注意：

    1. 根據(jù)以上內(nèi)容寫一篇短文，不要逐句翻譯，可適當(dāng)增加細(xì)節(jié)以使行文連貫。

2. 詞數(shù)：120個(gè)左右。開頭已給出，不計(jì)詞數(shù)。

3. 復(fù)合型人才 multi-skilled people 專業(yè)人才 expert

 

Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?

The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads through the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.                                     

Answer 1

Should Science and Arts Education Be Separated?

The issue of separating science and arts education is getting heated up as debate spreads through the country, which attracts tens of thousands of votes.  About 50% of the people interviewed think it unwise to get arts and science separated in high school.  In their opinion, a real expert needs a wide range of knowledge.  With the development of modern society, multi-skilled people are in great demand.  However, over 40% of them insist that they should be separated so that students can concentrate on some subjects and become experts.  Besides, they will not be overburdened as before.   

As far as I’m concerned, it will be better if we don’t separate science and arts education.  Because a strong ability in both science and arts is helpful for the long-term development of individuals and the society as a whole.  All over the world.  only in China are science and arts separated, which has had a bad effect on students’ development.  It's high time we changed this situation.